Rehabilitation Assessment of Post Intensive Care Syndrome

Main Article Content

Kevin Triangto
Peggy
Dian Marta Sari
Nury Nusdwinuringtyas
Siti Chandra Widjanantie

Abstract

The awareness of symptoms experienced after intensive care seems to have been extensively studied since the pandemic wave in 2019. The persistence or new occurrence of symptoms after intensive care is diagnosed as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). The syndrome encloses multiple system disorders and therefore requires thorough utilization of assessment tools, which unfortunately have no standard clinical practice guidelines. Several subdomains that are crucial for assessment include physical, cognitive, and mental functions. Other aspects to be observed include quality of life, physical examination, and functional tests, particularly those related to reduced cardiorespiratory endurance. This review aimed to highlight the most notable list of tools to be used in the outpatient assessment setting of PICS. The feasibility was also tested in a recent workshop session for physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists, and it was possible to accomplish this in 30 min. Until a consensus is reached on the PICS assessment, it is strongly suggested that practitioners exercise these tools and use them in daily practice.

Article Details

How to Cite
Triangto, K., Peggy, Sari, D. M., Nusdwinuringtyas, N., & Widjanantie, S. C. (2024). Rehabilitation Assessment of Post Intensive Care Syndrome. Indonesian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 13(2), 165 - 174. https://doi.org/10.36803/indojpmr.v13i2.397
Section
Literature Review
Author Biographies

Kevin Triangto, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita

Department of Prevention and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan KitaHospital Jakarta, Indonesia

Peggy, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, CiptoMangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta, Indonesia

Dian Marta Sari, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, Dr.Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung, Indonesia

Nury Nusdwinuringtyas, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, CiptoMangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta, Indonesia

Siti Chandra Widjanantie, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia,Persahabatan Hospital Jakarta, Indonesia

References

1. Brown SM, Bose S, Banner-Goodspeed V, Beesley SJ, Dinglas VD, Hopkins RO, et al. Approaches to addressing post-intensive care syndrome among intensive care unit survivors A Narrative Review. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Aug 1;16(8):947–56.
2. Rawal G, Yadav S, Kumar R. Post-intensive care syndrome: An overview. J Transl Int Med. 2017 Jun 30;5(2):90–2.
3. Carel D, Pantet O, Ramelet AS, Berger MM. Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) physical, cognitive, and mental health outcomes 6-months to 7 years after a major burn injury: A cross-sectional study. Burns. 2023 Feb 1;49(1):26–33.
4. Nakamura K, Kawasaki A, Suzuki N, Hosoi S, Fujita T, Hachisu S, et al. Grip strength correlates with mental health and quality of life after critical care: A retrospective study in a post-intensive care syndrome clinic. J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 2;10(14).
5. Nakanishi N, Liu K, Kawauchi A, Okamura M, Tanaka K, Katayama S, et al. Instruments to assess post-intensive care syndrome assessment: a scoping review and modified Delphi method study. Crit Care. 2023 Dec 1;27(1).
6. Nakanishi N, Liu K, Kawakami D, Kawai Y, Morisawa T, Nishida T, et al. Post-intensive care syndrome and its new challenges in coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic: A review of recent advances and perspectives. Vol. 10, Journal of Clinical Medicine. MDPI; 2021.
7. He M, Wang Y, Zhang XY, Wang CQ, Zheng XT, Yang YH, et al. Developing strategy of clinical practice guidelines for post-intensive care syndrome: a systematic review of 14 practice guidelines and 10 consensus statements. Unpublished study. 2020.
8. Spies CD, Krampe H, Paul N, Denke C, Kiselev J, Piper SK, et al. Instruments to measure outcomes of post-intensive care syndrome in outpatient care settings – Results of an expert consensus and feasibility field test. J Intensive Care Soc. 2021 May 1;22(2):159–74.
9. Farley KJ, Eastwood GM, Bellomo R. Long-term follow-up after prolonged mechanical ventilation A feasibility study of functional status and follow-up clinic preferences of patients at high risk of post intensive care syndrome. Vol. 44, Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016.
10. Yakubi M, Devlin A, Venn R, Hodgson L. 1-year outcomes of patients admitted to critical care with treatment limitations: A dual-centre observational study. J Intensive Care Soc. 2023 Aug 1;24(3):338–40.
11. Ramnarain D, Pouwels S, Fernández-Gonzalo S, Navarra-Ventura G, Balanzá-Martínez V. Delirium-related psychiatric and neurocognitive impairment and the association with post-intensive care syndrome—A narrative review. Vol. 147, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2023. p. 460–74.
12. Lee A, Zeleznik H, Coffey Scott J, Erie S, York Fatima NA, Needham D, et al. Perspective Home and Community-Based Physical Therapist Management of Adults With Post-Intensive Care Syndrome [Internet]. Vol. 100, Physical Therapy 1062 Physical Therapy. 2020.
13. Sayde GE, Stefanescu A, Hammer R. Interdisciplinary Treatment for Survivors of Critical Illness due to COVID-19: Expanding the Post-Intensive Care Recovery Model and Impact on Psychiatric Outcomes. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2023;64(3):226–35.
14. Mehlhorn J, Freytag A, Schmidt K, Brunkhorst FM, Graf J, Troitzsch U, et al. Rehabilitation interventions for postintensive care syndrome: A systematic review. Vol. 42, Critical Care Medicine. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2014. p. 1263–71.
15. Parry SM, Nalamalapu SR, Nunna K, Rabiee A, Friedman LA, Colantuoni E, et al. Six-Minute Walk Distance After Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vol. 36, Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. SAGE Publications Inc.; 2021. p. 343–51.
16. Fuke R, Hifumi T, Kondo Y, Hatakeyama J, Takei T, Yamakawa K, et al. Early rehabilitation to prevent postintensive care syndrome in patients with critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 8, BMJ Open. BMJ Publishing Group; 2018.
17. Muradov O, Petrovskaya O, Papathanassoglou E. Effectiveness of cognitive interventions on cognitive outcomes of adult intensive care unit survivors: A scoping review. Vol. 34, Australian Critical Care. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2021. p. 473–85.
18. Vlake JH, Van Genderen ME, Schut A, Verkade M, Wils EJ, Gommers D, et al. Patients suffering from psychological impairments following critical illness are in need of information. J Intensive Care. 2020 Jan 9;8(1).
19. Jeong YJ, Kang J. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure post-intensive care syndrome. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2019 Dec 1;55.
20. Portnoy S, Reif S, Mendelboim T, Rand D. Postural control of individuals with chronic stroke compared to healthy participants: Timed-Up-and-Go, Functional Reach Test and center of pressure movement. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(5):685–93.
21. Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Rensink M, Schuurmans M. Clinimetric Properties of the Timed Up and Go Test for Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(3):197–210.
22. Kusumaningsih W, Triangto K, Salim H, Benlidayi IC. Gait turning patterns in chronic ischemic stroke males and its relationship to recovery: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (United States). 2019;98(38).
23. Ciesielska N, Sokołowski R, Mazur E, Podhorecka M, Polak-Szabela A, Kȩdziora-Kornatowska K. Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test better suited than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) detection among people aged over 60? Meta-analysis. Psychiatr Pol. 2016;50(5):1039–52.
24. Statsenko Y, Habuza T, Gorkom KN Van, Zaki N, Almansoori TM, Al Zahmi F, et al. Proportional Changes in Cognitive Subdomains During Normal Brain Aging. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Nov 15;13.
25. Rambe AS, Fitri FI. Correlation between the Montreal cognitive assessment-Indonesian version (MoCA-Ina) and the Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) in elderly. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017;5(7):915.
26. Thompson AJ, Turner AJ. A comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020;38:575–91.
27. Purba FD, Hunfeld JAM, Iskandarsyah A, Fitriana TS, Sadarjoen SS, Ramos-Goñi JM, et al. The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L value set. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35:1153–65.
28. Deka P, Pozehl BJ, Pathak D, Williams M, Norman JF, Alonso WW, et al. Predicting maximal oxygen uptake from the 6 min walk test in patients with heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Feb 10;8(1):47–54.
29. Giannitsi S, Bougiakli M, Bechlioulis A, Kotsia A, Michalis LK, Naka KK. 6-minute walking test: a useful tool in the management of heart failure patients. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;13:1753944719870084.
30. Kitai T, Shimogai T, Tang WHW, Iwata K, Xanthopoulos A, Otsuka S, et al. Short physical performance battery vs. 6-minute walking test in hospitalized elderly patients with heart failure. European Heart Journal Open. 2021;1(1):oeab006.
31. Nunez-Cortes R, Rivera-Lillo G, Arias-Campoverde M, Soto-Garcia D, Garcia-Palomera R, Torres-Castro R. Use of sit-to-stand test to assess the physical capacity and exertional desaturation in patients post COVID-19. Chron Respir Dis. 2021;18:1479973121999205.
32. Lobato CT, Camões J, Carvalho D, Vales C, Dias CC, Gomes E, et al. Risk factors associated with post-intensive care syndrome in family members (PICS-F): A prospective observational study. J Intensive Care Soc. 2023;24(3):247–57.